S/4HANA Editions
SAP offers multiple S/4HANA deployment options, eitheras an on-premise or cloud variant.
When it comes to content, functionality, support, and industry solutions, the on-premise version corresponds to SAP Business Suite. Here, users have the full range of ERP services and can decide on upgrades themselves.
S/4HANA Cloud, which was released two years after S/4HANA On-Premise, offers many features in a slimmed-down form. Users can choose between the Marketing, Finance, or Professional Services Cloud. The complete ERP package comes with the SAP S/4HANA Enterprise Management Cloud.
SAP SuccessFactors, SAP Jam, SAP Hybris, SAP Ariba, and SAP Fieldglass can be integrated with both the on-premise and cloud variants. The following is an overview of the most important S/4HANA On-Premise editions.
S/4HANA 1610
SAP released this version in 2016, following on from the previous version in 1511. With the integration of SAP S/4HANA for Finance, S/4HANA 1610 offers a wider range of functions and combines all financial data in one system. Thanks to the tile design and new search functions, the operation is even more intuitive. In addition to new industry solutions, this version also includes SAP Extended Warehouse Management (SAP EWM), which simplifies the system landscape even more.
S/4HANA 1709
With S/4HANA 1709, SAP introduced further innovations for the on-premise solution in 2017. The second generation of the Hana 2.0 in-memory database ensures enhanced security, new recovery functions and management via the SAP Hana co*ckpit. In addition to an optimized user interface, this version also integrates SAP Leonardo Machine Learning, which enables smart manufacturing and supports the automation of business processes. There are also new functions and apps for production, marketing and sales.
S/4HANA 1809
Version 1809, which SAP released in 2018, contains even more machine learning functions. These are primarily focused on the areas of procurement, production, and sales. New features such as predictive accounting make planning in financial accounting easier by simulating goods issues after a sales order. This on-premise version also integrates the innovations of the S/4HANA Cloud. In total, users benefit from more than 1,500 added functions since the last release.
S/4HANA 1909
S/4HANA 1909 was launched in late 2019 and is the latest on-premise version of S/4HANA. This release also focuses on intelligent automation, forecasting, and the provision of best practices. A major innovation is Group Reporting, which supports companies in achieving rapid group reporting. With the integration of the SAP Analytics Cloud, financial planning can now be carried out completely in the ERP system. Modeling makes it easy to simulate the financial impact of business decisions.
What are the challenges of migration to S/4HANA?
Since SAP will discontinue support for its current ERP systems in the near future, many SAP Architects are already preparing for a changeover. However, because the migration to a new ERP system is not a typical IT project, but rather a fundamental system change, the implementation is associated with some challenges. In 2018, LeanIX and PwC conducted a study that identified the biggest migration hurdles for companies.
It turned out that existing complex IT landscapes, unclean master data, and company-specific ABAP code that is not compatible with S/4HANA are considered the biggest challenges. Further concerns create inconsistent business processes that need to be harmonized before migration.
Furthermore, change management lacks the necessary expertise to develop the right strategy. In some cases, the migration process is also slowed down by individual stakeholders, who must be involved in the coordination process.
What is the best way to migrate to SAP S/4HANA?
Before migrating to SAP S/4HANA, SAP System Experts have to make a few important fundamental decisions that influence the overall migration strategy. For example, switching to SAP S/4HANA Cloud System requires a different approach than switching to SAP S/4HANA On-Premise System.
Another crucial question is whether the existing SAP ECC system with its data and settings should simply be converted. In some cases, it may make sense to set up a completely new ERP system that will cause fewer problems in the future. In any case, migration requires good preparation and a transparent strategy that is understandable for all business areas and stakeholders.
From the study mentioned above, it is clear that the right enterprise architecture (EA) tools are an important tool for a smooth migration. More than half of the companies surveyed stated that they use EA tools to assess the current status and plan the target architecture. As part of the business capability concept, EA tools also provide a detailed roadmap that divides the migration to SAP S/4HANA into individual steps.
Enterprise architecture solutions such as LeanIX integrate easily with SAP Solution Manager and bring the necessary transparency to a complex ERP landscape. This is ultimately seen by the respondents as the greatest migration challenge. SAP Activate pillars and specific migration approaches available to a company are explained below and in our detailed Greenfield vs. Brownfield approach comparison.
Greenfield approach
If a company decides to adopt the greenfield strategy, it abandons its existing ERP system. This has the advantage that a new, uniform system can be implemented that only contains the processes and data that are actually necessary. If a company completely redefines its enterprise architecture, innovations can also be integrated more easily and a high level of functionality can be achieved.
In the study mentioned above, only 14 percent of all respondents chose this approach because it involves more effort. However, when switching to the SAP S/4HANA cloud version, the greenfield approach is unavoidable as the systems are completely replaced.
Brownfield approach
With the brownfield strategy, a system conversion takes place. This means that existing business processes are taken over and optimized if necessary. Since most companies do not want to completely abandon their custom ERP system, the brownfield approach is the most popular migration path. According to the study, 44 percent of respondents choose this strategy, while 42 percent opt for a combined greenfield and brownfield variant.
To ensure a smooth transition, EA tools are used to divide the conversion into clear phases. The tools also ensure that old processes are rethought so that redundancies and complexity are not adopted. The advantage over the greenfield approach is that the project time for system conversion is reduced.
Landscape Transformation
Strictly speaking, landscape transformation is not an independent migration strategy. It is simply a method that large companies with complex system landscapes can use to prepare for migration. In practice, this means that databases are cleaned up and consolidated to reduce the footprint before the change.
Companies can also use this approach to combine several ERP systems from different vendors. Such a simplification is also possible during the actual transformation. Whether this makes sense depends on the system landscape and the target system. In many cases, an enterprise architect works with all three approaches to achieve the best possible approach.
Conclusion
Without a doubt, SAP S/4HANA is the intelligent real-time ERP system of the future. It gives companies the opportunity to optimize their processes or to set them up from scratch. They can use the latest technologies such as machine learning and simulation to achieve a high degree of automation and transparency. An intuitive and mobile-friendly user interface, which adapts to the respective user, offers flexibility and allows role-specific work.
Unlike previous ERP systems, SAP S/4HANA offers fast access to all data and its analysis thanks to the in-memory database. This enables users to make well-founded decisions in a very short time.
Since the migration to SAP S/4HANA involves a number of challenges, the changeover must be carefully planned, and potentially overlooked by the SAP Center of Excellence. Which migration approaches make sense depends on the actual and target architecture of the company. EA tools help to ensure a smooth migration by closing the gap between strategy and implementation.
